Article info
PDFCommentary
Does the harm component of the harmful dysfunction analysis need rethinking?: Reply to Powell and Scarffe
- Correspondence to Professor Jerome C Wakefield, Department of Social Work and Psychiatry, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA; jerome.wakefield{at}nyu.edu
Citation
Does the harm component of the harmful dysfunction analysis need rethinking?: Reply to Powell and Scarffe
Publication history
- Received July 18, 2019
- Accepted July 23, 2019
- First published August 13, 2019.
Online issue publication
September 09, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 September 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Response to commentaries on Powell/Scarffe feature article
- Treatments of homosexuality in Britain since the 1950s—an oral history: the experience of professionals
- Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak
- Responding to religious patients: why physicians have no business doing theology
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- Naturalism and the social model of disability: allied or antithetical?
- The significance of ‘severity’
- Associations between parental socioeconomic position and health-seeking behaviour for diarrhoea and acute respiratory infection among under-5 children in Myanmar: a cross-sectional study