Article Text
Abstract
In developing their policy on paediatric medical assistance in dying (MAID), DeMichelis, Shaul and Rapoport decide to treat euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide as ethically and practically equivalent to other end-of-life interventions, particularly palliative sedation and withdrawal of care (WOC). We highlight several flaws in the authors’ reasoning. Their argument depends on too cursory a dismissal of intention, which remains fundamental to medical ethics and law. Furthermore, they have not fairly presented the ethical analyses justifying other end-of-life decisions, analyses and decisions that were generally accepted long before MAID was legal or considered ethical. Forgetting or misunderstanding the analyses would naturally lead one to think MAID and other end-of-life decisions are morally equivalent. Yet as we recall these well-developed analyses, it becomes clear that approving of some forms of sedation and WOC does not commit one to MAID. Paediatric patients and their families can rationally and coherently reject MAID while choosing palliative care and WOC. Finally, the authors do not substantiate their claim that MAID is like palliative care in that it alleviates suffering. It is thus unreasonable to use this supposition as a warrant for their proposed policy.
- euthanasia
- end of life care
- palliative care
- care of dying minors
- right to refuse treatment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors JLG wrote and revised the manuscript. NKG assisted with writing and editing. MP contributed to early drafts of the paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Linked Articles
- Extended essay
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
- Does the doctrine of double effect apply to the prescription of barbiturates? Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia
- Continuing the conversation about medical assistance in dying
- Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital
- The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands
- Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- ‘How is it possible that at times we can be physicians and at times assistants in suicide?’ Attitudes and experiences of palliative care physicians in respect of the current legal situation of suicide assistance in Switzerland
- Palliative sedation: ethics in clinical practice guidelines – systematic review