Article info
Response
On legal age change
- Correspondence to Dr William Simkulet, Park University, 8700 NW River Park Drive, Parkville, MO, 64152; Simkuletwm{at}yahoo.com
Citation
On legal age change
Publication history
- Received March 5, 2019
- Revised April 1, 2019
- Accepted April 23, 2019
- First published July 13, 2019.
Online issue publication
August 02, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 August 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Moral case for legal age change
- Age change, official age and fairness in health
- What a drag it is getting old: a response to Räsänen
- Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics
- Against the nihilism of ‘legal age change’: response to Räsänen
- Age change in healthcare settings: a reply to Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen
- Retailer compliance with tobacco control laws in New York City before and after raising the minimum legal purchase age to 21
- The International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement on age determination in high-level young athletes
- On Ageing and Maturing
- Early marriage, poor reproductive health status of mother and child well-being in India