Article Text
Commentary
Commentary on Koplin and Wilkinson
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding This research was supported by the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- The concise argument: consistency and moral uncertainty
- How should we treat human–pig chimeras, non-chimeric pigs and other beings of uncertain moral status?
- Harming animals for research and for food in conditions of moral uncertainty
- Ethical issues when modelling brain disorders innon-human primates
- Lessons from Frankenstein 200 years on: brain organoids, chimaeras and other ‘monsters’
- Animus: human-embodied animals
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- A qualified endorsement of embryonic stem cell research, based on two widely shared beliefs about the brain-diseased patients such research might benefit
- Implications of moral uncertainty: implausible or just unpalatable?