Article Text
Abstract
Recent reports in Australia have suggested that some medical practitioners are refusing to treat children who have not been vaccinated, a practice that has been observed in the USA and parts of Europe for some years. This behaviour, if it is indeed occurring in Australia, has not been supported by the Australian Medical Association, although there is broad support for medical practitioners in general having the right to conscientious objection. This paper examines the ethical underpinnings of conscientious objection and whether the right to conscientious objection can be applied to the refusal to treat unvaccinated children. The implications of such a decision will also be discussed, to assess whether refusal to treat unvaccinated children is ethically justifiable. The best interests of both existing and new patients are crucially important in a doctor’s practice, and the tension between these two groups of patients are contemplated in the arguments below. It is argued that on balance, the refusal to treat unvaccinated children constitutes unjustified discrimination.
- conscientious objection
- paediatrics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Factors contributing to practitioner choice when declining involvement in legally available care: A scoping protocol
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Should professional interpreters be able to conscientiously object in healthcare settings?
- Junior doctors and conscientious objection to voluntary assisted dying: ethical complexity in practice
- When should conscientious objection be accepted?