Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Distinction between euthanasia and palliative sedation is clear-cut
  1. Lars Johan Materstvedt
  1. Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
  1. Correspondence to Professor Lars Johan Materstvedt, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; lars.johan.materstvedt{at}ntnu.no

Abstract

This article is a response to Thomas David Riisfeldt’s paper entitled ‘Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation’. It is shown that as far as euthanasia and palliative sedation are concerned, Riisfeldt has not established that a common ground, or a similarity, between the two is the relief of suffering. Quite the contrary, this is not characteristic of euthanasia, neither by definition nor from a clinical point of view. Hence, the argument hinges on a conceptually and empirically erroneous premise and is accordingly a non-starter.

  • care of the dying patient
  • end of life care
  • ethics
  • euthanasia
  • palliative care
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors LJM is the sole contributor.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.