Article Text
PDFCommentary
Delineating the role of penile transplantation when traditional male circumcisions go wrong in South Africa
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None delcared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Penile transplantation as an appropriate response to botched traditional circumcisions in South Africa: an argument against
- In response to an argument against penile transplantation
- Traditional male circumcision and the risk for HIV transmission among men: a systematic review
- Does voluntary medical male circumcision protect against sexually transmitted infections among men and women in real-world scale-up settings? Findings of a household survey in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- P3.387 Prevalence and Predictors of Rape Perpetration Among Male Secondary School Students in Peri-Urban Xhosa Communities in South Africa
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- Native American patients’ perception and attitude about kidney transplant: a qualitative assessment of patients presenting for kidney transplant evaluation
- Factors associated with HIV in younger and older adult men in South Africa: findings from a cross-sectional survey
- ‘Dirty pigs’ and the xenotransplantation paradox
- Forced circumcision of men (abridged)