Article info
PDFOriginal research
Moral case for legal age change
- Correspondence to Joona Räsänen, Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Box 1020 Blindern, Oslo 0315, Norway; joona.rasanen{at}ifikk.uio.no
Citation
Moral case for legal age change
Publication history
- Received December 5, 2018
- Revised February 11, 2019
- Accepted February 25, 2019
- First published March 14, 2019.
Online issue publication
August 02, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 August 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- What a drag it is getting old: a response to Räsänen
- On legal age change
- Against the nihilism of ‘legal age change’: response to Räsänen
- Age change, official age and fairness in health
- Age change in healthcare settings: a reply to Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen
- Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics
- Is ageing undesirable? An ethical analysis
- Age-dependent prognostic value of exercise capacity and derivation of fitness-associated biologic age
- Construction of the secondary care administrative records frailty (SCARF) index and validation on older women with operable invasive breast cancer in England and Wales: a cohort study
- Priority dilemmas in dialysis: the impact of old age