Citation Tools
PDFFeature article
Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
Other content recommended for you
- Genome editing, Goldilocks and polygenic risk scores
- Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing
- Guerrilla eugenics: gene drives in heritable human genome editing
- We need to talk about imperatives
- Heritable human genome editing is ‘currently not permitted’, but it is no longer ‘prohibited’: so says the ISSCR
- Performance of polygenic risk scores in screening, prediction, and risk stratification: secondary analysis of data in the Polygenic Score Catalog
- The moral argument for heritable genome editing requires an inappropriately deterministic view of genetics
- Goldilocks and the two principles. A response to Gyngell et al
- Three models for the regulation of polygenic scores in reproduction
- Calibration of polygenic risk scores is required prior to clinical implementation: results of three common cancers in UKB