Article info
PDFOriginal research
The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
- Correspondence to Dr Robert F Card, Department of Medical Humanities, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA; robert.card7{at}gmail.com
Citation
The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
Publication history
- Received September 21, 2018
- Revised November 15, 2018
- Accepted December 2, 2018
- First published January 7, 2019.
Online issue publication
March 18, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 February 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine
- Reasons, reasonability and establishing conscientious objector status in medicine
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Is there no alternative? Conscientious objection by medical students
- Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey
- Mistakes and missed opportunities regarding cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection