Article Text
Abstract
The principle of self-determination plays a crucial role in contemporary clinical ethics. Somewhat simplified, it states that it is ultimately the patient who should decide whether or not to accept suggested treatment or care. Although the principle is much discussed in the academic literature, one important aspect has been neglected, namely the fact that real-world decision making is temporally extended, in the sense that it generally takes some time from the point at which the physician (or other health care professional) determines that there is a decision to be made and that the patient is capable of making it, to the point at which the patient is actually asked for his or her view. This article asks under what circumstances, if any, temporising—waiting to pose a certain treatment question to a patient judged to have decision-making capacity—is compatible with the principle of self-determination.
- decision-making
- autonomy
- competence/incompetence
- clinical ethics
- paternalism
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Theoretical work. All authors have participated on equal terms.
Funding Jenny Lindberg’s contribution to this article is funded by the Newman Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Other content recommended for you
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- When psychiatry and bioethics disagree about patient decision making capacity (DMC)
- The cultural specifity of research ethics—or why ethical debate in France is different
- Making a difference: incorporating theories of autonomy into models of informed consent
- The right to a self-determined death as expression of the right to freedom of personal development: The German Constitutional Court takes a clear stand on assisted suicide
- Is posthumous semen retrieval ethically permissible?
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- A review of recorded information given to patients starting to take clozapine and the development of guidelines on disclosure, a key component of informed consent
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Trial by Triad: substituted judgment, mental illness and the right to die