Article Text
Abstract
In ‘Why Abortion is Immoral’, Don Marquis argues that abortion is wrong for the same reason that murder is wrong, namely, that it deprives a human being of an FLO, a ‘future like ours,’ which is a future full of value and the experience of life. Marquis’ argument rests on the assumption that the human being is somehow deprived by suffering an early death. I argue that Marquis’ argument faces the ‘Epicurean Challenge’. The concept of ‘deprivation’ requires that some discernible individual exists who can be deprived. But if death involves total annihilation, then no discernible individual exists to be so deprived. I argue that the Epicurean Challenge must be addressed before it can be proven that Marquis is correct to claim that abortion and murder are wrong because they deprive someone of an FLO.
- abortion
- ethics
- death
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen
- Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to ’Abortion and Deprivation'
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- Murder, abortion, contraception, greenhouse gas emissions and the deprivation of non-discernible and non-existent people: a reply to Marquis and Christensen
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- The “future like ours” argument and human embryonic stem cell research