Article info
PDFResponse
Who are ‘we’ to speak of benefits and harms? And to whom do we speak? A (sympathetic) response to Woollard on breast feeding and language
- Correspondence to Dr Ben Saunders, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK; b.m.saunders{at}soton.ac.uk
Citation
Who are ‘we’ to speak of benefits and harms? And to whom do we speak? A (sympathetic) response to Woollard on breast feeding and language
Publication history
- Received August 25, 2018
- Revised September 18, 2018
- Accepted September 25, 2018
- First published October 20, 2018.
Online issue publication
March 18, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 March 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Should we talk about the ‘benefits’ of breastfeeding? The significance of the default in representations of infant feeding
- Breastfeeding and defeasible duties to benefit
- In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege
- Examining the use of ‘natural’ in breastfeeding promotion: ethical and practical concerns
- Bioethics and health and human rights: a critical view
- Institute of Medical Ethics Guidelines for confirmation of appointment, promotion and recognition of UK bioethics and medical ethics researchers
- Authorship policies of bioethics journals
- Promoting the initiation of breast feeding
- ‘Surely you’re not still breastfeeding’: a qualitative exploration of women’s experiences of breastfeeding beyond infancy in the UK
- Done good