Article info
Response
Moral reasons not to breastfeed: a response to Woollard and Porter
- Correspondence to Laura Frances Callahan, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08904, USA; laura.callahan24{at}gmail.com
Citation
Moral reasons not to breastfeed: a response to Woollard and Porter
Publication history
- Received June 4, 2018
- Revised August 14, 2018
- Accepted August 20, 2018
- First published September 19, 2018.
Online issue publication
February 22, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 September 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Breastfeeding and defeasible duties to benefit
- Should we talk about the ‘benefits’ of breastfeeding? The significance of the default in representations of infant feeding
- Examining the use of ‘natural’ in breastfeeding promotion: ethical and practical concerns
- Breast feeding in infants diagnosed with phenylketonuria (PKU): a scoping review
- Is procreative beneficence obligatory?
- Approaches to supporting lactation and breastfeeding for very preterm infants in the NICU: a qualitative study in three European regions
- Breastfeeding duration and cognitive, language and motor development at 18 months of age: Rhea mother–child cohort in Crete, Greece
- Effects of in-hospital breast feeding on brain function development in preterm infants in China: study protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study
- Breastfeeding duration and non-verbal IQ in children
- Protective effect of exclusive breastfeeding against infections during infancy: a prospective study