Article Text
Abstract
Is it morally justifiable to force non-consenting pregnant women to submit to caesarean surgery to save their fetus in distress? Even though proponents and opponents largely agree on the interests at stake, such as the health and life of the fetus and the respect for bodily integrity and autonomy of pregnant women, they disagree on which moral weight to attach to these interests. This is why disagreements about the justifiability of forced caesareans tend to be pervasive and intractable. To sidestep this deadlock, we will focus on conditions that give rise to the ‘caesarean dilemma’ in the first place, namely the conflict between inherent norms and values medical professionals are committed to by virtue of being a medical professional. Using the reflective equilibrium, we will test the opponents’ and proponents’ considered judgments about forced caesareans against the norms and values they—as medical professionals—are committed to and determine whether they are coherent. Subsequently we will identify the proponents’ incoherencies between the considered judgments and norms and values they are committed to and conclude that as long as these incoherencies are in place, forced caesareans are morally impermissible.
- interests of woman/fetus/father
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reviewing the womb
- Ethical challenges in fetal surgery
- Spotlight on the fetus: how physical activity during pregnancy influences fetal health: a narrative review
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Discussing motherhood when the oncological prognosis is dire: ethical considerations for physicians
- Vulnerability, therapeutic misconception and informed consent: is there a need for special treatment of pregnant women in fetus-regarding clinical trials?
- Disclosure and consent: ensuring the ethical provision of information regarding childbirth
- Evaluation of the risk of umbilical cord prolapse in the second twin during vaginal delivery: a retrospective cohort study
- Colonisation of Group B Streptococcus and its effects on pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective study
- Metastatic unknown primary tumour presenting in pregnancy: a rarity posing an ethical dilemma