Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Like many, I find the idea of relying on patient preference predictors (PPP) in life-or-death cases ethically troubling. As part of his stimulating discussion, Sharadin1 diagnoses such unease as a worry that using PPPs disrespects patients’ autonomy, by treating their most intimate and significant desires as if they were caused by their demographic traits. I agree entirely with Sharadin’s ‘debunking’ response to this concern: we can use statistical correlations to predict others’ preferences without thereby assuming any causal claim (although I am worried that blocking the conversational implicatures may be far harder in emotionally charged life-and-death contexts than at dinner parties). However, I suspect that, for at least some of us, our unease about PPPs stems from a different kind of ‘autonomy’ concern. In this commentary, then, I will explore this concern, and show how it relates to Sharadin’s work.
Very many of our preferences are caused, ultimately, by facts which are outside our control, such as our demographic features. However, I suggest that we can still act autonomously on the basis of such preferences, when they are preferences which we endorse. Imagine, for example, that Jane has grown up in a church-growing environment, which has shaped many of her preferences, …
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Patient preference predictors and the problem of naked statistical evidence
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- What you believe you want, may not be what the algorithm knows
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
- Sovereignty, authenticity and the patient preference predictor
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- To be, or not to be? The role of the unconscious in transgender transitioning: identity, autonomy and well-being