Article info
PDFResearch ethics
What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- Correspondence to Dr Joanna Różyńska, Institute of Philosophy, Center for Bioethics & Biolaw, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmiescie 3, Warsaw 00-927, Poland; j.rozynska{at}uw.edu.pl
Citation
What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
Publication history
- Received March 14, 2017
- Revised March 31, 2018
- Accepted May 2, 2018
- First published May 24, 2018.
Online issue publication
August 22, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 August 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Exploitation and enrichment: the paradox of medical experimentation
- Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
- Better recognition for research participants: what society should learn from covid-19
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
- What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research?
- Increasing the amount of payment to research subjects
- Systematic review and metasummary of attitudes toward research in emergency medical conditions
- “Fair’s fair argument” and voluntarism in clinical research: But, is it fair?
- Scientific research is a moral duty