Article info
PDFCharlie Gard
Paper
Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie Gard case
- Correspondence to Professor John J Paris, Boston College, ChestnutHill, MA 02467, USA; john.paris{at}bc.edu
Citation
Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie Gard case
Publication history
- Received April 19, 2018
- Accepted April 27, 2018
- First published May 18, 2018.
Online issue publication
June 26, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 June 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Mixed motives, mixed outcomes when accused parents won’t agree to withdraw care
- Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?
- When ethical reform became law: the constitutional concerns raised by recent legislation in Taiwan
- The best interests test at the end of life on PICU: a plea for a family centred approach
- Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children?
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Ronald E Cranford
- The challenge of Terri Schiavo: lessons for bioethics
- Ancient rites and new laws: how should we regulate religious circumcision of minors?
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice