Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Ensuring respect for persons in COMPASS: a cluster randomised pragmatic clinical trial
- Correspondence to Dr Joseph E Andrews, Institutional Review Board, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA; jandrews{at}wakehealth.edu
Citation
Ensuring respect for persons in COMPASS: a cluster randomised pragmatic clinical trial
Publication history
- Received July 18, 2017
- Revised February 1, 2018
- Accepted March 21, 2018
- First published May 2, 2018.
Online issue publication
July 26, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 July 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Other content recommended for you
- Comparative effectiveness of paediatric kidney stone surgery (the PKIDS trial): study protocol for a patient-centred pragmatic clinical trial
- Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation
- Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
- Does Waiver of Written Informed Consent from the Institutional Review Board Affect Response Rate in a Low-Risk Research Study?
- Informed consent in pragmatic trials: results from a survey of trials published 2014–2019
- A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials – special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond
- Remote monitoring of medication adherence and patient and industry responsibilities in a learning health system
- Deferred consent for the enrolment of neonates in delivery room studies: strengthening the approach
- Randomised comparative effectiveness trial of Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after hiP and kneE Replacement (PEPPER): the PEPPER trial protocol
- Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexed