Article info
PDFCommentary
The ‘ethics committee’ job is administrative: a response to commentaries
- Correspondence to Dr Andrew John Moore, Department of Philosophy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; andrew.moore{at}otago.ac.nz
Citation
The ‘ethics committee’ job is administrative: a response to commentaries
Publication history
- Received February 25, 2018
- Revised March 5, 2018
- Accepted March 12, 2018
- First published March 29, 2018.
Online issue publication
June 26, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 June 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- The job of ‘ethics committees’
- Code-consistent ethics review: defence of a hybrid account
- Judgement and the role of the metaphysics of values in medical ethics
- The structure of ethics review: expert ethics committees and the challenge of voluntary research euthanasia
- Study protocol: a survey exploring patients’ and healthcare professionals’ expectations, attitudes and ethical acceptability regarding the integration of socially assistive humanoid robots in nursing
- Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees
- Between universalism and relativism: a conceptual exploration of problems in formulating and applying international biomedical ethical guidelines
- Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy
- Translational ethics? The theory–practice gap in medical ethics
- ‘Lines in the sand’: an Australian qualitative study of patient group practices to promote independence from pharmaceutical industry funders