Citation Tools
PDFResponse
Disability discrimination and misdirected criticism of the quality-adjusted life year framework
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Disability discrimination and misdirected criticism of the quality-adjusted life year framework
Other content recommended for you
- Preference-based disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument for glaucoma: a mixed methods study protocol
- Developing a cerebral palsy-specific preference-based measure for a six-dimensional classification system (CP-6D): protocol for a valuation study
- Public versus patient health preferences: protocol for a study to elicit EQ-5D-5L health state valuations for patients who have survived a stay in intensive care
- International guidelines for self-report and proxy completion of paediatric health-related quality of life measures: a protocol for a systematic review
- Producing a preference-based quality of life measure for people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a mixed-methods study protocol
- Valuation study for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (Dental Caries Utility Index - DCUI) among Australian adolescents - study protocol
- Developing a preference-based measure for weight-specific health-related quality of life in adolescence: the WAItE UK valuation study protocol
- Developing a dementia-specific preference-based quality of life measure (AD-5D) in Australia: a valuation study protocol
- Quality-adjusted life years
- Comparison of the CHU-9D and the EQ-5D-Y instruments in children and young people with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study