Article Text
Abstract
There are two main ways of understanding the function of surrogate decision making in a legal context: the Best Interests Standard and the Substituted Judgment Standard. First, we will argue that the Best Interests Standard is difficult to apply to unconscious patients. Application is difficult regardless of whether they have ever been conscious. Second, we will argue that if we accept the least problematic explanation of how unconscious patients can have interests, we are also obliged to accept that the Substituted Judgment Standard can be coherently applied to patients who have never been conscious at the same extent as the Best Interests Standard. We then argue that acknowledging this result is important in order to show patients respect.
- applied and professional ethics
- autonomy
- clinical ethics
- competence/incompetence
- decision-making
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors The article is authored by A-KMA and KAJ.
Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement There is no additional unpublished data.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- Consent for anaesthesia
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Patients' perspectives of the substitute decision maker: who makes better decisions?
- Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
- Why we should stop using animal-derived products on patients without their consent
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present