Article info
Commentary
AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case
- Correspondence to Dr Paul T Menzel, Professor of Philosophy (Emeritus), Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma, WA 98447, USA; menzelpt{at}plu.edu
Citation
AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case
Publication history
- Received February 5, 2018
- Accepted February 9, 2018
- First published February 26, 2018.
Online issue publication
January 25, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 February 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia
- Response to: ‘Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns’ by Jongsma et al
- Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- Do guidelines on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch hospitals and nursing homes reflect the law? A content analysis