Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In his recent article ‘Nudging, Informed Consent and Bullshit’, William Simkulet1 convincingly argues that certain types of nudging satisfy Frankfurt’s criteria of bullshit. As a prelude to this argument, Simkulet considers whether recommendations and framing are types of nudging and whether they satisfy the requirement of adequate disclosure essential for a valid informed consent. He defines nudging as the systematic attempt at altering behaviour by non-rational means, and describes adequate disclosure as providing the patient with true information that enables an understanding of treatment options and their risks and benefits. Simkulet argues that recommendations and framing are types of rational persuasion in that they potentially enhance patients’ understanding of treatment options and their risks and benefits. Therefore, (1) not only do they not qualify as nudging, but (2) they may be required in order to secure adequate disclosure. In this brief comment, I focus on Simkulet’s considerations of framing and show that framing may be nudging and that it may violate the requirements of informed consent.
Simkulet on framing
The framing of medical information may influence patients’ preferences for treatment. It has been shown that framing information about a risky medical intervention in chance of survival rather than risk of death increases patients’ preferences for the intervention.2 3 In his exploration of framing, Simkulet contends that the fact that people respond differently to …
Footnotes
Contributors TP is the sole author.
Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Public health ethics
- Response
- Response
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- At odds with the truth
- Nudging, informed consent and bullshit
- Understanding risk in living donor nephrectomy
- A failure to communicate: patients with cerebral aneurysms and vascular neurosurgeons
- Using the General Social Survey – National Death Index cohort to study the relationship between neighbourhood fear and mortality in the USA
- Truthful nudging
- International differences in acute coronary syndrome patients’ baseline characteristics, clinical management and outcomes in Western Europe: the EURHOBOP study
- Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk
- Prevalence and risk factors of worry among teachers during the COVID-19 epidemic in Henan, China: a cross-sectional survey
- Rationing and life-saving treatments: should identifiable patients have higher priority?