Article info
PDFResponse
Objections still fail: a response to Faria
- Correspondence to Dr Gardar Arnason, Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Gartenstrasse 47, 72074 Tübingen, Germany; gardar.arnason{at}uni-tuebingen.de
Citation
Objections still fail: a response to Faria
Publication history
- Received September 22, 2017
- Accepted September 27, 2017
- First published October 22, 2017.
Online issue publication
April 26, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 April 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- A flimsy case for the use of non-human primates in research: a reply to Arnason
- Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?
- Ethical issues when modelling brain disorders innon-human primates
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Is there a place for animal experiments?
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Persons, post-persons and thresholds
- Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock