Article info
PDFPolitical philosophy and medical ethics
Paper
Against lifetime QALY prioritarianism
- Correspondence to Dr Anders Herlitz, Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg SE-405 30, Sweden; andersherlitz{at}gmail.com
Citation
Against lifetime QALY prioritarianism
Publication history
- Received March 1, 2017
- Revised September 11, 2017
- Accepted September 24, 2017
- First published October 9, 2017.
Online issue publication
January 30, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (30 January 2018).
- Previous version (30 January 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting
- Against proportional shortfall as a priority-setting principle
- Pandemic prioritarianism
- Justice and the NICE approach
- The significance of ‘severity’
- Justice in COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: rethinking the approach
- A note on Brock: prioritarianism, egalitarianism and the distribution of life years
- Do not despair about severity—yet
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty
- Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis