Article info
PDFCommentary
The limits of research institutions in setting research priorities
- Correspondence to Dr Joseph Millum, Clinical Center Department of Bioethics/Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, 10/1C118, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; millumj{at}cc.nih.gov
Citation
The limits of research institutions in setting research priorities
Publication history
- Received December 4, 2016
- Accepted January 19, 2017
- First published February 8, 2017.
Online issue publication
January 04, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (4 January 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Approaches to prioritising primary health research: a scoping review
- Adolescent mental health research in Tanzania: a study protocol for a priority setting exercise and the development of an interinstitutional capacity strengthening programme
- What matters most to patients about primary healthcare: mixed-methods patient priority setting exercises within the PREFeR (PRioritiEs For Research) project
- Institutions as an ethical locus of research prioritisation
- Patients, clinicians and researchers working together to improve cardiovascular health: a qualitative study of barriers and priorities for patient-oriented research
- Prognostic significance and immune correlates of CD73 expression in renal cell carcinoma
- Action to protect the independence and integrity of global health research
- Enhancing social value considerations in prioritising publicly funded biomedical research: the vital role of peer review
- The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study
- The Yorkshire Kidney Screening Trial (YKST): protocol for a feasibility study of adding non-contrast abdominal CT scanning to screen for kidney cancer and other abdominal pathology within a trial of community-based CT screening for lung cancer