Article Text
PDFCommentary
The limits of research institutions in setting research priorities
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors LP and JM developed the arguments in the manuscript. LP wrote the first draft. LP and JM revised the manuscript.
Funding National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Approaches to prioritising primary health research: a scoping review
- Adolescent mental health research in Tanzania: a study protocol for a priority setting exercise and the development of an interinstitutional capacity strengthening programme
- What matters most to patients about primary healthcare: mixed-methods patient priority setting exercises within the PREFeR (PRioritiEs For Research) project
- Institutions as an ethical locus of research prioritisation
- Patients, clinicians and researchers working together to improve cardiovascular health: a qualitative study of barriers and priorities for patient-oriented research
- Prognostic significance and immune correlates of CD73 expression in renal cell carcinoma
- Action to protect the independence and integrity of global health research
- Enhancing social value considerations in prioritising publicly funded biomedical research: the vital role of peer review
- The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study
- The Yorkshire Kidney Screening Trial (YKST): protocol for a feasibility study of adding non-contrast abdominal CT scanning to screen for kidney cancer and other abdominal pathology within a trial of community-based CT screening for lung cancer