Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
Against the accommodation of subjective healthcare provider beliefs in medicine: counteracting supporters of conscientious objector accommodation arguments
- Correspondence to Ricardo Smalling, Department of Geography, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada; Ricardo.Smalling{at}gmail.com
Citation
Against the accommodation of subjective healthcare provider beliefs in medicine: counteracting supporters of conscientious objector accommodation arguments
Publication history
- Received October 3, 2016
- Accepted October 6, 2016
- First published October 31, 2016.
Online issue publication
June 16, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 March 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Two conceptions of conscience and the problem of conscientious objection
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile
- Response to: ‘Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies’ by Schuklenk and Smalling
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews