Article Text
Abstract
A sterilising or functional cure for HIV is a serious scientific challenge but presents a viable pathway to the eradication of HIV. Such an event would be extremely valuable in terms of relieving the burden of a terrible disease; however, a coordinated commitment to implement healthcare interventions, particularly in regions that bear the brunt of the HIV epidemic, is lacking. In this paper, we examine two strategies for evaluating candidate HIV cures, based on our beliefs about the likelihood of global implementation. We reject possibilist interpretations of social value that do not account for the likelihood that a plan to cure HIV will be followed through. We argue, instead, for an actualist ranking of options for action, which accounts for the likelihood that a cure will be low cost, scalable and easy to administer worldwide.
- HIV Infection and AIDS
- Research Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- When to start paediatric testing of the adult HIV cure research agenda?
- Why cure, why now?
- Reconceptualising risk–benefit analyses: the case of HIV cure research
- First-in-human HIV-remission studies: reducing and justifying risk
- The Ebola clinical trials: a precedent for research ethics in disasters
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune effector cell-related adverse events
- How to keep high-risk studies ethical: classifying candidate solutions
- Cancer immunotherapy in adult patients with HIV
- Factors associated with attitudes towards HIV cure research among transgender women and travestis: a cross-sectional survey in São Paulo, Brazil
- The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia