Article info
PDFEditor's choice
Paper
Prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis: contemporary practices in light of the past
- Correspondence to Dr Ana S Iltis, Department of Philosophy and Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Wake Forest University, 1834 Wake Forest Rd, Winston-Salem, NC 27106, USA; iltisas{at}wfu.edu
Citation
Prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis: contemporary practices in light of the past
Publication history
- Received February 19, 2016
- Accepted April 18, 2016
- First published May 9, 2016.
Online issue publication
November 25, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- Trisomy 21 in both fetuses in a DCDA twin pregnancy
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people
- Cell-free fetal DNA and RNA in maternal blood: implications for safer antenatal testing
- Women’s choices in non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy screening: results from a single centre prior to introduction in England
- Preserving women’s reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities?: the case of Heidi Crowter and Maire Lea-Wilson in the light of NIPT debates in England, France and Germany
- Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of ‘routinisation’ in prenatal screening
- Reproductive carrier screening: responding to the eugenics critique
- Ethical considerations for choosing between possible models for using NIPD for aneuploidy detection