Article Text
PDFResearch ethics
Response
Response to: ‘We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants’ by D. Hunter
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter Follow David Hunter at @idmonfish
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants
- Response to: ‘We could be heroes: ethical issues with the pre-recruitment of research participants’ by Hunter
- Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
- Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
- Beyond regulatory approaches to ethics: making space for ethical preparedness in healthcare research
- Introducing patient and public involvement practices to healthcare research in Austria: strategies to promote change at multiple levels
- Implementation of the EU clinical trial regulation transforms the ethics committee systems and endangers ethical standards
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees