Article info
PDFCommentary
Clarifying and defending the endorsed life approach to surrogate decision-making
- Correspondence to John Phillips, Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; jphillips{at}unc.edu
Citation
Clarifying and defending the endorsed life approach to surrogate decision-making
Publication history
- Received June 25, 2015
- Accepted June 26, 2015
- First published July 28, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- Response to commentaries: ‘autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor’
- Treating competent patients by force: the limits and lessons of Israel’s Patient’s Rights Act
- Consent for anaesthesia
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Patients, doctors and the good life (for the patient)
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions