Article info
PDFCommentary
Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar
- Correspondence to Dr Kevin R Smith, SET, Abertay University, Bell Street, Dundee DD1 1HG, UK; k.smith{at}abertay.ac.uk
Citation
Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar
Publication history
- Received March 13, 2015
- Revised April 15, 2015
- Accepted May 31, 2015
- First published June 19, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Religion's place at the table of ‘secular’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
- Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
- On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar’s ‘Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine’
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- Does religion deserve a place in secular medicine?
- Doing good medical ethics: a Christian perspective
- In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege
- You shall bury him: burial, suicide and the development of Catholic law and theology
- Some principles of Islamic ethics as found in Harrisian philosophy
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?