Article info
Author meets critics: response
Saviour siblings: no avoiding the hard questions
- Correspondence to Dr Colin Gavaghan, NZ Law Foundation Centre for Law and Policy in Emerging Technologies, Faculty of Law, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; colin.gavaghan{at}otago.ac.nz
Citation
Saviour siblings: no avoiding the hard questions
Publication history
- Received March 27, 2015
- Accepted April 13, 2015
- First published April 30, 2015.
Online issue publication
November 24, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (30 April 2015).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Saviour Siblings: reply to critics
- A relational approach to saviour siblings?
- A response to Saviour Siblings: A Relational Approach to the Welfare of the Child in Selective Reproduction
- Summary of Saviour Siblings
- Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?
- Doubly distributing special obligations: what professional practice can learn from parenting
- The best interest standard and children: clarifying a concept and responding to its critics
- Navigating parental requests: considering the relational potential standard in paediatric end-of-life care in the paediatric intensive care unit
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Getting beyond the welfare of the child in assisted reproduction