Responses
Current controversy
Research led by participants: a new social contract for a new kind of research
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 8 May 2015
- Published on: 8 May 2015PLR - better to boost PPIShow More
The Article states "In health research, funding bodies and academic institutions actively undertake patient and public involvement programmes to ensure that studies adequately reflect the perspectives and input of patients and citizens." I do not agree.
I have been a member of a research ethics committeee in England for seven years. I do not recognise this statement, nor would my colleagues. In very few cases...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Development of patient decision support tools for motor neuron disease using stakeholder consultation: a study protocol
- Subjects no more: what happens when trial participants realize they hold the power?
- Caregiver burden and associated factors among primary caregivers of patients with ALS in home care: a cross-sectional survey study
- Descriptive epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: new evidence and unsolved issues
- Epidemiology of ALS in Korea using nationwide big data
- Towards a national genomics medicine service: the challenges facing clinical-research hybrid practices and the case of the 100 000 genomes project
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the innate immune system: protocol for establishing a biobank and statistical analysis plan
- Multicentre, prospective registry study of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in mainland China (CHALSR): study protocol
- Study on sleep-wake disorders in patients with genetic and non-genetic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- A roadmap to ALS prevention: strategies and priorities