Article Text
Research ethics
Commentary
Dementia research and advance consent: it is not about critical interests
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors KRJ has written the first draft of the paper. SvdV has given critical remarks for revision. Both have contributed substantially to this commentary paper.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Research ethics
- Research ethics
- Research ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
- Limits of advance directives in decision-making around food and nutrition in patients with dementia
- Advance directives for oral feeding in dementia: a response to Shelton and Geppert
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- Response to commentaries by Karin Rolanda Jongsma and Suzanne van de Vathorst, and Oliver Hallich
- ‘Mrs A’: a controversial or extreme case?
- AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case