Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Correspondence to Professor Heather Draper, Medicine, Ethics, Society and History (MESH), School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK; h.draper{at}bham.ac.uk
Citation
Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
Publication history
- Received August 29, 2012
- Revised March 19, 2013
- Accepted April 1, 2014
- First published June 23, 2014.
Online issue publication
June 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (29 June 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Quantitative valuation placed by children and teenagers on participation in two hypothetical research scenarios
- Applying for ethical approval for research in the United Kingdom
- Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries
- Patient organisations’ views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research: a pilot study in Portugal
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches
- More guidelines on research ethics?
- Lay REC members: patient or public?
- Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations
- ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews