Article info
Clinical ethics
Paper
Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Correspondence to Dr Thomas D Harter, Department of Humanities, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI 54601-5467, USA; tdharter{at}gundersenhealth.org
Citation
Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
Publication history
- Received July 18, 2013
- Revised January 22, 2014
- Accepted February 3, 2014
- First published February 24, 2014.
Online issue publication
February 20, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (24 February 2014).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
- Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey
- Reasons, reasonability and establishing conscientious objector status in medicine
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card