Article Text
Abstract
Objectives Potentially life-shortening medical end-of-life practices (end-of-life decisions (ELDs)) remain subject to conceptual vagueness. This study evaluates how physicians label these practices by examining which of their own practices (described according to the precise act, the intention, the presence of an explicit patient request and the self-estimated degree of life shortening) they label as euthanasia or sedation.
Methods We conducted a large stratified random sample of death certificates from 2007 (N=6927). The physicians named on the death certificate were approached by means of a postal questionnaire asking about ELDs made in each case and asked to choose the most appropriate label to describe the ELD. Response rate was 58.4%.
Results In the vast majority of practices labelled as euthanasia, the self-reported actions of the physicians corresponded with the definition in the Belgian euthanasia legislation; practices labelled as palliative or terminal sedation lack clear correspondence with definitions of sedation as presented in existing guidelines. In these cases, an explicit life-shortening intention by means of drug administration was present in 21.6%, life shortening was estimated at more than 24 h in 51% and an explicit patient request was absent in 79.7%.
Discussion Our results suggest that, unlike euthanasia, the concept of palliative or terminal sedation covers a broad range of practices in the minds of physicians. This ambiguity can be a barrier to appropriate sedation practice and indicates a need for better knowledge of the practice of palliative sedation by physicians.
- End of Life Care
- Decision-making
- Palliative Care
- Euthanasia
- Care of the Dying Patient
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- End-of-life decision-making in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland: does place of death make a difference?
- Medical murder in Belgium and the Netherlands
- Influence of physicians’ life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countries
- First do no harm: intentionally shortening lives of patients without their explicit request in Belgium
- Euthanasia and palliative sedation in Belgium
- Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands
- Physicians’ labelling of end-of-life practices: a hypothetical case study
- Belgian euthanasia law: a critical analysis
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”