Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Commentary
Conscientious objection and its social context
- Correspondence to Dr Ryan E Lawrence, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, Box 90, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA;rlawrence{at}uchicago.edu
Citation
Conscientious objection and its social context
Publication history
- Received August 6, 2013
- Accepted August 13, 2013
- First published August 29, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Is there no alternative? Conscientious objection by medical students
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Medical students’ attitudes towards conscientious objection: a survey
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies