Article info
PDFStem-cell derived gametes
Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: a critique of Sparrow's inclusive definition of the term ‘in vitro eugenics’
- Correspondence to Dr Misao Fujita, Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell of Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, The Kyoto Technoscience Center #3, 14 Yoshidakawara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8305 Japan;misao-fujita{at}cira.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Citation
Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: a critique of Sparrow's inclusive definition of the term ‘in vitro eugenics’
Publication history
- Received June 27, 2013
- Accepted August 6, 2013
- First published August 28, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Can artificial parthenogenesis sidestep ethical pitfalls in human therapeutic cloning? An historical perspective
- US court temporarily lifts ban on stem cell research
- In vitro eugenics
- Time to reconsider stem cell ethics—the importance of induced pluripotent cells
- Court allows US human embryonic stem cell research to continue, for now
- Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: a context for both science and ethics
- News
- Some doubts about in vitro eugenics as a human enhancement technology
- Embryo as epiphenomenon: some cultural, social and economic forces driving the stem cell debate