In a recent issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics, Svoboda and Van Howe commented on the 2012 change in the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy on newborn male circumcision, in which the AAP stated that benefits of the procedure outweigh the risks. Svoboda and Van Howe disagree with the AAP conclusions. We show here that their arguments against male circumcision are based on a poor understanding of epidemiology, erroneous interpretation of the evidence, selective citation of the literature, statistical manipulation of data, and circular reasoning. In reality, the scientific evidence indicates that male circumcision, especially when performed in the newborn period, is an ethically and medically sound low-risk preventive health procedure conferring a lifetime of benefits to health and well-being. Policies in support of parent-approved elective newborn circumcision should be embraced by the medical, scientific and wider communities.
- Male; Parental Consent; Human Rights; Medicine
- Preventive; Medicine
- Evidence-Based; Metaethics; Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Medical aspects of male circumcision
- Benefits of newborn circumcision: is Europe ignoring medical evidence?
- Circumcision: Divided we fall
- Male circumcision and HIV prevention: ethical, medical and public health tradeoffs in low-income countries
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision