Article Text
Abstract
Moving forward rapidly in the clinical research phase, uterus transplantation may be a future treatment option for women with uterine factor infertility, which accounts for three per cent of all infertility in women. This new method of treatment would allow women, who currently rely on gestational surrogacy or adoption, to gestate and birth their own genetic offspring. Since uterus transplantation carries significant risk when compared with surrogacy and adoption as well as when compared with other organ transplants, it requires greater justification because its goals are quality of life, not life-saving, in their scope. It is important to address questions regarding the physical, psychosocial and ethical risks and benefits of uterus transplantation for all three parties involved—the patient, the donor and the potential child—as well as discuss the regulatory implications as research on uterus transplantations moves forward.
- Transplantation
- Reproductive Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Facial allograft transplantation, personal identity and subjectivity
- Vascularised composite allotransplantation: implications for the Defence Medical Services
- ‘A Procedure Without a Problem’, or the face transplant that didn’t happen. The Royal Free, the Royal College of Surgeons and the challenge of surgical firsts
- Should uterus transplants be publicly funded?
- Uterus transplantation for fertility preservation in patients with gynecologic cancer
- Justifying surgery’s last taboo: the ethics of face transplants
- Equity in access to facial transplantation
- Face of the future
- Transplants for non-lethal conditions: a case against hand transplantation in minors
- Framing gestation: assistance, delegation, and beyond