Article info
PDFCommentary
There are (STILL) no coercive offers
- Correspondence to Dr Alan Wertheimer, Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156, USA; wertheimera{at}cc.nih.gov
Citation
There are (STILL) no coercive offers
Publication history
- Received April 10, 2013
- Revised April 26, 2013
- Accepted April 29, 2013
- First published May 23, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers
- Surgical castration, Texas law and the case of Mr T
- Surgical castration, coercion and ethics
- Offering castration to sex offenders: the significance of the state's intentions
- Making the cut: analytical and empirical bioethics
- Chemical castration for sex offenders
- Should neurotechnological treatments offered to offenders always be in their best interests?
- Neurointerventions and informed consent
- Surgical castration, coercive offers and coercive effects: it is still not about consent
- Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?