Article info
Current controversies
The AAP Task Force on Neonatal Circumcision: a call for respectful dialogue
- Correspondence to Dr Douglas S Diekema, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, C9S-6, 1900 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; diek{at}u.washington.edu
Citation
The AAP Task Force on Neonatal Circumcision: a call for respectful dialogue
Publication history
- Received March 7, 2013
- Accepted March 7, 2013
- First published March 18, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits’ are morally irrelevant
- Medical aspects of male circumcision
- Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Circumcision: Divided we fall
- Male circumcision and HIV prevention: ethical, medical and public health tradeoffs in low-income countries
- Benefits of newborn circumcision: is Europe ignoring medical evidence?
- Risk factors for genital HPV DNA in men resemble those found in women: a study of male attendees at a Danish STD clinic