Article Text
PDFResponse
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) from the patient's perspective
Abstract
This is a response to Dr Charlotte Rosalind Blease's paper ‘Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), the Placebo Effect and Informed Consent’, written by Julie K. Hersh who has had ECT. Hersh argues that placebo effect is impossible to prove without endangering the lives of participants in the study. In addition, informing potential ECT patients of unproven placebo effect could discourage patients from using a procedure that from experience has proven highly effective.
- Concept of Mental Health
- Electrical Stimulation of the Brain
- Mentally Ill and Disabled Persons
- Neuroimaging
- Psychiatry
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Electroconvulsive therapy, the placebo effect and informed consent
- Informed consent and ECT: how much information should be provided?
- ‘Delusional’ consent in somatic treatment: the emblematic case of electroconvulsive therapy
- Current status of electroconvulsive therapy for mood disorders: a clinical review
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Electroconvulsive therapy: a life course approach for recurrent depressive disorder
- Should we stop using electroconvulsive therapy?
- Electroconvulsive therapy: the importance of informed consent and ‘placebo literacy’
- Efficacy and safety of maintenance electroconvulsive therapy for sustaining resolution of severe aggression in a major neurocognitive disorder
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a historical evaluation and future prognosis of therapeutically relevant ethical concerns