Article Text
PDFCommentaries
The harms of status enhancement could be compensated or outweighed: a response to Agar
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interest None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentaries
- Commentaries
- Commentaries
- Commentaries
- Commentaries
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Still afraid of needy post-persons
- The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
- Genetic Enhancement, Post-persons, and Moral Status: Author reply to commentaries
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- Highlights from this issue