Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Response
Religious red herrings
- Correspondence to Dr Mark Sheehan, Oxford BRC Ethics Fellow, The Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Rosemary Rue Building, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LG, UK; mark.sheehan{at}ethox.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Religious red herrings
Publication history
- Accepted March 19, 2012
- First published August 13, 2012.
Online issue publication
June 29, 2021
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children?
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- The role of religious beliefs in ethics committee consultations for conflict over life-sustaining treatment
- Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
- The effect of religion on the perception of health states among adults in the United Arab Emirates: a qualitative study
- The fox and the grapes: an Anglo-Irish perspective on conscientious objection to the supply of emergency hormonal contraception without prescription
- Assessing the ethical weight of cultural, religious and spiritual claims in the clinical context
- The role of the church in developing the law
- Religion influencing medical decisions made for children
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality