Article Text
Abstract
The recent judgement in the case of Re:M in which the Court held that it would be unlawful to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a woman in a minimally conscious state raises a number of ethical issues of wide application. Central to these is the extent to which precedent autonomous decisions should be respected in the absence of a legally binding advance decision. Well-being interests can survive the loss of many of the psychological faculties that support personhood. A decision to respect precedent autonomy can contradict the well-being interests of the individual after capacity is lost. These decisions raise difficult questions about personal identity and about the threshold of evidence that is required of an earlier decision in order for it to be respected.
- Medical ethics
- mental health legislation
- mental health
- mental capacity
- decision-making capacity
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions
- Best interests and the sanctity of life after W v M
- The weight attributed to patient values in determining best interests
- Withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a minimally conscious state: Re: M and its repercussions
- Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- A matter of life and death
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- ‘In a twilight world’? Judging the value of life for the minimally conscious patient